Analysts put the value of terminal pay in Contra Costa County at a range of $4 to $24 in additional income out of every $100 in final average wage, one of three factors used to calculate workers' retirement benefit amount. The most generous amount goes to those who retire from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, according to the Nike Air Force 3 association's 2011 actuarial valuation.
Flinn gave few clues during his questioning as to how he will rule but put the dozens of attorneys on notice that he wants to finish the high profile case by mid December. The separate Alameda, Contra Costa and Merced lawsuits were consolidated into his courtroom. The Marin County case is proceeding on its own, but it could wind up joining the other three cases on appeal.
Until recently, Contra Costa, Alameda, Merced and Marin counties permitted workers to accumulate in excess of what they would earn in either a single Black Air Forces Low Top
Not every current public employee is eligible for terminal pay.
"I'm going to work Nike Force Mid Winter Mens Trainers
The agreed upon pension formula is a vested right that courts have long upheld as inviolable once given, labor attorney Peter Saltzman wrote in court briefs. But state lawyers say an illegal benefit cannot be vested.
If Flinn ultimately sides with the state, thousands of not yet retired or "legacy" public employees could lose up to a quarter of their future monthly pension payments, depending on their labor contracts. The court's decision will have no direct impact on the paychecks of people who have already retired.
seven days a week on this case," Flinn said. "I wanted to be finished (last) April, and it's October. I don't want people to have to keep standing on one foot and then on the other like they have to go potty."
Flinn stayed the new pension law pending the outcome of the lawsuit.
year or a three year average of unused vacation, holiday and sick leave, convert the value to cash at the time of retirement and boost their monthly pension check. Contra Costa banned the practice for all new hires starting on Jan. 1, 2011.
The state's position is part of its response to the November 2012 lawsuit filed by public employee unions challenging the pension reform legislation.
MARTINEZ In a potentially landmark legal challenge to Gov. Jerry Brown's 2012 pension reform legislation that has financial implications for thousands of public employees and taxpayers, state attorneys Thursday said county retirement systems had illegally included vacation and other types of terminal pay in their members' pension calculations for nearly 15 years.
Other member agencies include the San Ramon, Moraga Orinda and East Contra Costa fire districts and Contra Costa Superior Court.
For vested employees, the perk varies depending on labor contracts negotiated between the agency and each union. Contra Costa County, which is more than 80 percent of the retirement system's rolls, has 15 employee unions.
"It's been a moving target," Leiderman said.
Intended as an anti spiking measure, Brown's pension reform law specifically prohibited for all public workers who retire on or after Jan. 1, 2013, the inclusion of certain types of pay that exceeded what was earned and payable during the agreed upon calculation period typically the highest income year or the highest three year average.
Landmark legal challenge to East Bay County pension reform gets day in court
Despite the Ventura County court decision and settlements between public agencies, retirement associations and unions, the practice of adding into retirement formulas unused vacation and other extras referred to as terminal pay in excess of what a worker would typically earn in a single year "was never allowed in state law," deputy attorney general Anthony O'Brien told the court. The law that governs county based pensions has been in effect since 1937.
Association lawyer Harvey Leiderman rejected the state's position during oral arguments. He said that decades of shifting California pension law has forced association boards to litigate and reach settlements in numerous disputed areas for which the state never previously registered Air Force Flyknit Low
New Balance 860v4
New Balance Womens 880v6
Nike Air Force 1 Low Canada
Air Force One High Gum
Air Force Shoes High
Nike Air Force 3
New Balance Blue And Yellow
Nike Air Force One Suede Black
Nike Air Force 1 High Woven
Nike Air Force 1 High Neon Pink
Nike Air Force 1 Low Maroon
Nike Air Force 1 Blue Red White
New Balance Dark Blue
Nike Air Force 1 High 2018
New Balance 320 Og